Output of experiment for optimizing the f1 score:

@ParagEkbote Thanks for the PR. I'm worrying about the CI failure. All examples in this repository are continuously tested by the GitHub Actions, so I expect that this example can be tested too. It seems that the API key of the Comet is missing. Is is possible to generate the API key which can be used here?

@ParagEkbote Thanks for the PR. I'm worrying about the CI failure. All examples in this repository are continuously tested by the GitHub Actions, so I expect that this example can be tested too. It seems that the API key of the Comet is missing. Is is possible to generate the API key which can be used here?

No, we will probably need to add it as a GitHub repo secret in Settings->Secrets and Variables->Actions. WDYT?

cc: @HideakiImamura

Thanks for the reply. I understood.

Is it OK to use the generated API key of one of us (comitters) or should be use any universal API key?

Thanks for the reply. I understood.

Is it OK to use the generated API key of one of us (comitters) or should be use any universal API key?

Unless there is an enterprise plan available, we will need to use an individual API key.

cc: @HideakiImamura

I'm not sure but how about https://www.comet.com/docs/v2/api-and-sdk/python-sdk/advanced/running-offline/ like WandB example

I discussed with other committers. It would be great to remove the CI configuration file from this PR.

I discussed with other committers. It would be great to remove the CI configuration file from this PR.

I have removed the CI config file. Could you please review?

cc: @HideakiImamura

Hi @HideakiImamura, thank you for directing us.
Do you mean this repo does not test this comet example similar to the Kubernetes example https://github.com/optuna/optuna-examples/tree/main/kubernetes or plan to add CI config by another pull request for simplicity?

I have updated the example. Could you please review?

cc: @nzw0301

Lovely, I will check the changes this weekend!

I apologize for making breaking changes in my example. I've corrected it now and it shows the following Output:

Number of finished trials: 20

Best trial:
Value: 1.0

Params:
min_samples_leaf: 9
max_depth: 8
min_samples_split: 4

Could you please review?

cc: @nzw0301

Do you mean this repo does not test this comet example similar to the Kubernetes example https://github.com/optuna/optuna-examples/tree/main/kubernetes or plan to add CI config by another pull request for simplicity?

I realised that offline evaluation without an API key might be impossible, so please ignore my careless comments. Sorry.

I've renamed the file. Could you please review?

cc: @nzw0301

Are any pending changes that need to be addressed?

Could you please let me know?

cc:@HideakiImamura

This pull request has not seen any recent activity.

Let me merge this PR since this PR already got approval from the maintainer.

@ParagEkbote Thank you for your contribution!